BPFCheck a HackScience-backed answers that hold up
Check a Hack · science-backed help for the day you have

One useful move.
Made clear.

Tell BPF what you want help with right now. The system narrows the evidence to a practical tactic, explains why it fits, and connects you to an existing BPF tool when one can help you do it.

Four quick steps

What would help today?

One question at a time. The research stays under the hood.

Step 1 of 4Goal
The BPF evidence rule

Rate the claim — not the hype.

The same tactic can be useful for one outcome and unsupported for another.

SupportedThe exact useful claim is directly supported well enough for consumer use.
Supported With LimitsThe claim holds up, but population, dose, outcome, size of effect, or causality needs context.
Depends on ContextThe answer changes meaningfully by population, dose, timing, product, condition, or baseline status.
PromisingHuman evidence is encouraging, but it is not mature enough for a standard recommendation.
OverstatedThere is a real evidence-based kernel, but the popular version goes farther than the research supports.
Doesn’t Hold UpAdequate evidence contradicts the exact claim, or a proof/guarantee claim exceeds the evidence.
Not ReadyEvidence is still incomplete, conflicting, or not source-closed. BPF publishes no authoritative verdict yet.